Buying a Company in Turkey: Financial & Tax Due Diligence Guide
A practical guide for foreign buyers, investors, CFOs and deal teams assessing a Turkish target — from normalized EBITDA and net debt to working capital, tax exposures and post-closing finance risk.
Buying a profitable company in Turkey does not mean buying the profit shown in its statutory accounts. A buyer should test the sustainability of EBITDA, identify cash and debt-like items, establish a normal level of working capital, review tax and payroll exposures, reconcile shareholder and related-party balances, and understand which liabilities remain economically with the business after closing.
The central due diligence question is therefore not simply “Are the accounts correct?” It is “What earnings, cash flows and liabilities are actually being acquired — and what should the buyer pay for them?”
Türkiye remains an active transaction market. KPMG reported 574 M&A transactions in 2025 and estimated total deal volume, including undisclosed transactions, at approximately USD 18.5 billion. For an international buyer, however, a Turkish acquisition still requires careful translation between statutory accounting, operational reality and transaction economics.
What financial due diligence should answer
An audit and an M&A financial due diligence review serve different purposes. An audit is designed around the financial statements and applicable reporting framework. A buyer-side due diligence exercise is transaction-focused: it seeks to understand sustainable earnings, the quality of cash conversion, liabilities that may affect equity value, and the financial assumptions embedded in the purchase price.
Is EBITDA sustainable?
Separate recurring operating performance from owner-specific costs, one-offs, unusual income and accounting distortions.
Does profit convert into cash?
Examine receivable ageing, inventory, supplier terms, capital expenditure and recurring cash requirements.
What is really debt?
Identify bank debt, shareholder loans and other debt-like liabilities that should not remain in equity value.
Which historical risks transfer economically?
Review unpaid, under-accrued or disputed tax, VAT, withholding and payroll exposures and determine how they are protected in the deal.
1. Start with normalized EBITDA — not reported EBITDA
In owner-managed and mid-market businesses, reported EBITDA can contain items that will not continue under a new owner. The buyer should build a bridge from reported EBITDA to a sustainable or normalized level of earnings.
Typical adjustments include non-recurring legal or restructuring costs, owner-specific expenses, unusual foreign-exchange gains or losses, related-party charges that are not at market terms, exceptional bonuses, non-operating income, under-accrued expenses, and revenue or margin items that are not repeatable.
The important point is not the label attached to an adjustment. It is the evidence. A credible normalization should be supported by invoices, payroll data, contracts, management explanations, historical trends and — where relevant — a clear assessment of the cost that a new owner will actually incur.
2. Test revenue quality and margin sustainability
Revenue growth can create a misleading picture if it depends on customer concentration, short-term price increases, related-party sales, unusual year-end invoicing, channel stuffing, foreign-exchange effects or low-quality receivables.
A buyer should normally analyze:
- Monthly revenue by customer, product and geography
- Top customer concentration and customer churn
- Gross margin by product or business line
- Revenue cut-off around period-end
- Credit notes and post-period returns
- Related-party and shareholder-linked sales
- Contracted versus non-contracted revenue
- Recurring versus project-based income
- Foreign currency exposure in revenue and cost base
- Receivable collectability after the reporting date
For Turkish targets, the relationship between statutory invoices, e-invoice records, the general ledger, VAT reporting and management reporting is particularly useful. A revenue number that appears convincing in a management presentation should reconcile back to the books and to the underlying commercial evidence.
3. Establish normalized working capital before agreeing the price
Many private M&A transactions are priced on a cash-free, debt-free basis with a normalized level of working capital delivered at closing. If the target closes below that normal level, the buyer may have to inject cash immediately after completion.
Working capital analysis should therefore look beyond the closing balance. The buyer should examine seasonality, ageing, historical monthly trends, overdue receivables, slow-moving stock, supplier arrears, customer advances, prepayments and items that may have been deliberately accelerated or delayed before closing.
A working capital peg should be defined consistently with the accounting policies and classifications used for closing. Otherwise, a commercial agreement over price can turn into a post-closing accounting dispute.
4. Build the net debt and debt-like schedule from the ledger up
Bank borrowings are only the obvious part of net debt. Transaction pricing frequently requires a broader assessment of liabilities that are financing in nature, relate to a pre-closing period, or would otherwise require the buyer to fund an obligation that economically belongs to the seller.
| Area | Potential treatment | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Bank loans and accrued interest | Net debt | Traditional financing obligations reduce equity value in a cash-free, debt-free deal. |
| Shareholder / related-party loans | Often debt-like | They may need to be settled or waived before closing. |
| Overdue tax or social security liabilities | Potential debt-like item / specific risk | The liability may relate to the seller’s ownership period even if payable after closing. |
| Accrued transaction or employee bonuses | Fact-specific | Closing-triggered or pre-closing obligations may need separate treatment. |
| Factoring / supplier finance | Potential financing item | Classification can materially change net debt and working capital. |
| Unpaid dividends | Often seller-related | The buyer should understand whether the amount remains payable after closing. |
There is no universal list of debt-like items. The correct treatment depends on the SPA definition, the target’s operating model, the historical accounting treatment and the economics of the liability.
5. Read the Turkish trial balance like a buyer
A Turkish statutory chart of accounts can reveal transaction issues that are easy to miss in a high-level management pack. The following accounts often deserve direct attention during acquisition diligence.
| Turkish account | Due diligence question |
|---|---|
| 120 — Trade Receivables | How much is overdue, disputed, related-party or unlikely to convert into cash? |
| 131 — Receivables from Shareholders | Will shareholder balances be settled before closing, and are there tax implications? |
| 159 — Advances Given | Are balances recoverable and genuinely operating in nature? |
| 190 — VAT Carried Forward | Is the VAT asset recoverable through future taxable activity, and is the supporting documentation robust? |
| 320 — Trade Payables | Are suppliers current, or has cash generation been temporarily improved by delaying payment? |
| 331 — Payables to Shareholders | Is this operating, financing, distributive or otherwise seller-related? |
| 335 — Payables to Personnel | Are salary, bonus, leave or other employee obligations fully accrued? |
| 360 / 361 — Tax & SGK Payables | Are filings current, amounts reconciled and historical liabilities fully recognized? |
| 370 — Tax Provision | Does the balance reconcile to the expected current tax position and returns? |
These balances should not be reviewed in isolation. A buyer should reconcile them to tax filings, e-ledgers, bank movements, ageing reports, payroll data and supporting schedules.
6. Tax due diligence: focus on exposures that can survive closing
Tax due diligence should identify material historical exposures, available tax attributes and items that may need specific contractual protection. In a share acquisition, the legal entity continues after closing, so historic tax exposures remain inside the acquired company unless economically allocated elsewhere through the transaction documents.
Typical areas include:
- Corporate income tax returns and tax provisions
- Domestic minimum corporate tax implications where relevant
- VAT returns, carried-forward VAT and deduction support
- Withholding tax filings and payment status
- Payroll withholding and social security compliance
- Transfer pricing and related-party transactions
- Thin-capitalization / financing considerations where relevant
- Tax losses and ability to utilize them
- Tax inspections, assessments, litigation and settlements
- Incentives, exemptions and investment certificates
- Stamp tax and transaction-document exposure
- Fixed asset tax basis and depreciation
The Turkish Revenue Administration’s 2026 corporate tax guide confirms that the standard corporate tax rate applicable to most corporate taxpayers for the 2025 and 2026 accounting periods is 25%, with different rates applying to specified sectors and activities. A transaction model should therefore use the rate applicable to the target’s actual status rather than assuming one generic tax rate.
7. Share deal or asset deal?
A share deal generally means acquiring the shares of the existing legal entity together with its assets, contracts, employees, liabilities and historical tax profile. An asset deal allows selected assets and liabilities to be transferred, but the Turkish tax, VAT, stamp tax, employee, licensing and contractual consequences may differ depending on what is transferred and how the transaction is implemented.
| Issue | Share deal | Asset deal |
|---|---|---|
| Legal entity | Existing company continues | Buyer acquires defined assets / business components |
| Historic liabilities | Remain within the acquired company | Depends on liabilities assumed and applicable law |
| Tax due diligence | Usually critical because historic exposures remain in the entity | Still important, but focus changes to transferred assets and taxes triggered by transfer |
| Accounting focus | Net debt, working capital, QoE and balance-sheet risks | Asset perimeter, tax basis, transfer values and assumed obligations |
Turkey also has statutory merger and restructuring provisions under the Corporate Tax Law. Transactions meeting the relevant conditions can receive specific tax treatment; these rules should not be confused with an ordinary commercial share purchase.
8. Check Turkish Competition Authority filing requirements early
Competition clearance is a separate workstream from financial and tax diligence, but it can affect deal timing and signing/closing mechanics. The Turkish Competition Authority updated the merger-control thresholds in February 2026.
The Authority announced that the individual Turkish turnover threshold increased from TRY 250 million to TRY 1 billion, the aggregate Turkish turnover threshold from TRY 750 million to TRY 3 billion, and the worldwide turnover threshold from TRY 3 billion to TRY 9 billion. Whether a transaction is notifiable depends on the detailed rules, turnover calculations and the nature of the parties and transaction.
For a live transaction, competition counsel should confirm filing requirements using the current Communiqué and guidance rather than relying only on headline thresholds.
9. Turn diligence findings into deal protection
Due diligence creates value only when findings are translated into the transaction. A material issue may affect price, net debt, the working-capital mechanism, completion accounts, a specific indemnity, tax covenant, escrow, condition precedent or post-closing remediation plan.
| Diligence finding | Possible transaction response |
|---|---|
| Non-recurring earnings included in EBITDA | Reduce normalized EBITDA / valuation base |
| Working capital below normal level | Working capital peg or completion adjustment |
| Shareholder loan remains outstanding | Repayment at closing or debt-like treatment |
| Historic tax exposure | Specific indemnity, escrow or price protection |
| Uncertain receivable recoverability | Adjustment, specific mechanism or excluded balance |
10. Buyer-side financial & tax due diligence checklist
A practical first information request should normally cover at least the following:
- Three years of statutory financial statements
- Current-year monthly trial balances
- Management P&L by month and business line
- General ledger exports
- Customer and supplier ageing
- Inventory ageing and slow-moving stock
- Bank debt and facility agreements
- Shareholder / related-party balances
- Fixed asset register
- Capex history and committed capex
- Monthly headcount and payroll data
- Employee bonus and leave accruals
- Corporate tax returns
- VAT and withholding returns
- SGK declarations and payment status
- Tax audit / inspection correspondence
- Transfer-pricing documentation
- Related-party agreements
- Investment incentive certificates
- Material customer and supplier contracts
- Budget and forecast model
- Cash-flow forecasts
- Reconciliation between statutory and management reporting
- Post-balance-sheet collections and payments
11. Red flags we would investigate before signing
EBITDA rises while cash falls
May indicate working-capital absorption, weak collections, inventory build or aggressive cut-off.
Large shareholder balances
May require settlement, tax review and clear treatment in the net debt schedule.
Old receivables with no bad-debt provision
The balance sheet may overstate realizable working capital and cash conversion.
Persistent tax / SGK arrears
Can signal liquidity pressure, control weaknesses or historic compliance exposure.
Management accounts do not reconcile
A disconnect between the deal model and statutory books weakens confidence in pricing assumptions.
Large EBITDA add-backs
The more value depends on adjustments, the more evidence the buyer should demand.
12. Do not stop diligence at closing
A buyer can complete a transaction successfully and still lose control of the Turkish finance function in the first 100 days. The opening balance sheet, bank mandates, ERP access, tax filings, e-ledger processes, payroll controls, intercompany balances and group reporting calendar should be part of the integration plan before closing.
For an international group, the key question is whether the Turkish statutory layer can produce reliable, timely and explainable data for headquarters. Post-acquisition integration should therefore connect local bookkeeping and tax compliance with group reporting rather than treating them as separate workstreams.
Frequently asked questions
Is financial due diligence the same as an audit?
No. An audit and a transaction due diligence review have different objectives. Due diligence focuses on the commercial and transaction implications of the financial information — including sustainable EBITDA, cash conversion, net debt, working capital and purchase-price risk.
How many years should a buyer review?
Three historic years plus current-year monthly information is a common starting point, but the appropriate period depends on seasonality, recent changes, growth profile, availability of reliable information and the specific risks identified.
What is the most important number in a Turkish acquisition?
There is rarely one number. For many deals, the interaction between normalized EBITDA, the valuation multiple, net debt and normalized working capital ultimately determines equity value.
Should a buyer review tax if the company has a clean audit report?
Yes. Financial statement audit procedures do not replace transaction-specific tax due diligence. Historic tax, VAT, payroll, withholding and related-party risks should be evaluated separately.
Who should perform legal due diligence?
Legal due diligence should be led by qualified legal counsel. SystemsCPA’s focus is the financial, accounting and Turkish tax workstream and the translation of those findings into transaction economics and finance integration.
Considering an acquisition in Turkey?
SystemsCPA can support international buyers with a focused review of the target’s financials, normalized EBITDA, working capital, net debt, Turkish tax exposures and post-acquisition finance requirements — with findings explained directly to the buyer’s CFO, controller or deal team in English.
Discuss a Transaction →Sources & regulatory references
- KPMG Türkiye, KPMG Perspektifinden Birleşme ve Satın Alma Trendleri 2025.
- Turkish Competition Authority, Mergers and Acquisitions Legislation Updated — 11 February 2026.
- Turkish Revenue Administration, 2026 Corporate Tax Return Guide.
- Deloitte Türkiye, Transaction Execution Services — Financial and Tax Due Diligence.
- EY Türkiye, M&A Due Diligence.
Turn Turkey compliance into certainty
SYSTEMS CPA supports foreign-owned companies with company formation, accounting, tax compliance and payroll in Turkey — one accountable local partner. Reviewed by Evren Özmen, SMMM (Certified Public Accountant), TÜRMOB Reg. No. 35675.
