Is Turkey Reported Separately Under EU Public CbCR? Grey List Impact for 2026

Reviewed by Evren Özmen, CPA (SMMM)
Turkish Certified Public Accountant · Licensed by TÜRMOB, Reg. No. 35675 · Last reviewed October 2026
Public CbCR · EU Directive 2021/2101 · Turkey

By Evren Özmen, CPA (TÜRMOB Reg. No. 35675) · SYSTEMS CPA, Istanbul · Published · Updated

The short version On 9 October 2026 the EU Council kept Turkey on Annex II (the “grey list”) of its list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes. Because Turkey has been on Annex II for well over two consecutive years, any multinational group in scope of EU public country-by-country reporting (public CbCR) must publish its Turkish revenue, profit, tax and headcount as a separate line — not hidden in a “rest of world” total — and cannot use the five-year deferral for commercially sensitive data. For calendar-year groups, the first FY2025 report is due by 31 December 2026.

Key facts at a glance

ItemPosition (as of 22 October 2026)
Legal basisDirective (EU) 2021/2101 amending the Accounting Directive 2013/34/EU (new Articles 48a–48g)
Who is in scopeGroups with consolidated revenue above EUR 750 million in each of the last two consecutive financial years
Non-EU parents (e.g. Turkish, US, UK)Obligation falls on medium-sized and large EU subsidiaries and on qualifying EU branches (net turnover above EUR 12 million in each of the last two years)
First reporting yearFinancial years starting on or after 22 June 2024 → FY2025 for calendar-year groups (Romania applied it earlier, from FY2023)
Publication deadlineWithin 12 months of the balance sheet date → 31 December 2026 for FY2025; 31 December 2027 for FY2026
Turkey’s EU list statusAnnex II (grey list), confirmed by ECOFIN on 9 October 2026; outstanding item: automatic exchange of information with all Member States (Turkey does not exchange with Cyprus)
Consequence for Turkey dataSeparate, jurisdiction-level disclosure for Turkey; no deferral (omission) of Turkish data allowed
FormatCommon template and machine-readable formats under Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2952 for financial years starting on or after 1 January 2025
Next EU list reviewFebruary 2027

What is EU public CbCR?

Answer: EU public CbCR is a disclosure rule under Directive (EU) 2021/2101 that forces multinational groups with more than EUR 750 million of consolidated revenue to publish, on a public website or business register, a report showing revenue, profit before tax, income tax accrued and paid, accumulated earnings, employee numbers and activities for each EU Member State and each listed non-cooperative jurisdiction.

Unlike the OECD country-by-country report that groups already file with tax authorities, the EU report is public. Investors, customers, journalists, NGOs, trade unions and competitors can read it. That is the whole design: transparency by publication, not by exchange between administrations.

The reporting window is the financial year starting on or after 22 June 2024. Most Member States transposed the Directive on that baseline; a few moved earlier (Romania from FY2023). For a group with a calendar financial year, FY2025 is the first year, and its report must be public within 12 months of the balance sheet date — that is, by 31 December 2026.

Why does Turkey’s grey list status matter for public CbCR?

Answer: The Directive requires separate country-level data for every jurisdiction on Annex I, and for every jurisdiction that was on Annex II on 1 March of the financial year and has been listed there for at least two consecutive years. Turkey has been on Annex II for several consecutive years, so Turkish figures must appear on their own line, not aggregated.

For all other non-EU countries, a group may publish one aggregated “other tax jurisdictions” figure. In practice, that means a Turkish subsidiary’s numbers would normally disappear into a large rest-of-world total next to the UK, the US or the UAE. The grey list removes that option for Turkey.

The 9 October 2026 update did not change Turkey’s position. The Council recorded that Turkey is still not fully in line with its commitment on automatic exchange of information with all Member States — the long-running issue is the absence of exchange with Cyprus. Unless that is resolved and the Council removes Turkey at a future review (the next is scheduled for February 2027), the separate-disclosure rule keeps applying year after year.

The detail most groups miss: no deferral for Turkey

Member States may allow a group to omit commercially sensitive data for up to five years, provided the omission is disclosed and the data is published later. That safeguard does not apply to information on Annex I and qualifying Annex II jurisdictions. So the one country where a group might most want to use the deferral — because it is reported on its own — is exactly where the deferral is unavailable.

Summary Turkey on the grey list = Turkey shown separately + no five-year deferral. The Turkish numbers will be public, specific and comparable from the first report onward.

What exactly must be published for Turkey?

Under Article 48c of the Accounting Directive, the report must show, for Turkey as for each EU Member State:

Data itemWhat it means in practice for a Turkish entity
Nature of activitiesShort description (e.g. manufacturing, distribution, shared services, R&D)
Number of employeesFull-time equivalents in Turkey
RevenuesNet turnover plus other income, including from related parties (excluding dividends received from affiliated undertakings)
Profit or loss before taxAggregated for all group entities in Turkey
Income tax accruedCurrent-year corporate tax expense — deferred taxes and provisions for uncertain tax positions excluded
Income tax paidCash paid in the year, including quarterly advance (provisional) tax and withholding taxes suffered
Accumulated earningsRetained earnings at year-end

The report must also name the ultimate parent, list the subsidiaries in the EU and in listed jurisdictions, and give a narrative explanation of material discrepancies between tax accrued and tax paid. Groups may instead build the report on the OECD CbCR data definitions (Article 48c(4)), which is usually the efficient route because the data already exists.

The statutory auditor of the reporting EU entity must state in its audit report whether the entity was required to publish a public CbCR report and, if so, whether it did (Article 48f). Non-publication is therefore visible in the audited accounts, not only to the regulator.

Public CbCR vs OECD CbCR: what is different?

OECD / Turkish CbCR (confidential)EU public CbCR
AudienceTax authorities onlyThe public
Turkish legal basis / EU basisCorporate Tax Law No. 5520 Art. 13, Presidential Decision No. 8956, Transfer Pricing General Communiqué No. 1 (as amended by No. 5)Directive 2021/2101, transposed into each Member State’s company/accounting law
Jurisdictions shownEvery jurisdiction separatelyEU Member States + Annex I + qualifying Annex II separately; rest aggregated
Data itemsIncludes stated capital, tangible assets, related/unrelated revenue splitNarrower set (no stated capital or tangible assets)
Filed withTax administration (in Turkey via the Digital Tax Office)Business register and/or group website, available free for at least five years
Deadline12 months after year-end (Turkish notification: 6 months)12 months after the balance sheet date
Deferral of sensitive dataNot relevant (confidential)Up to 5 years — but not for Turkey

Public CbCR vs Pillar Two: why the numbers must agree

Turkey adopted the OECD global minimum tax through Law No. 7524 (Official Gazette, 2 August 2024), including a domestic minimum top-up tax. Many groups rely on the transitional CbCR safe harbour, which uses qualified CbCR data to test whether Turkey’s effective tax rate clears 15%. The same group will now publish Turkish profit and tax figures in the public report.

A Turkish ETR that looks low in the public report but passes the safe harbour in the Pillar Two filing — or the reverse — is exactly the kind of inconsistency a tax inspector, an auditor or a journalist will ask about. Our guide to the global minimum tax in Turkey covers the Pillar Two filings; the point here is that the two data sets now need one reconciliation.

Turkish parent vs EU parent: who actually files?

Turkish-parented groups with EU subsidiaries

Answer: A Turkish parent company is not subject to EU law, but its EU subsidiaries are. If the group exceeds EUR 750 million and has a medium-sized or large subsidiary, or a qualifying branch, in an EU Member State, that EU entity must publish a group-wide report — covering the Turkish parent and every consolidated entity, not just its own figures.

There is a practical way out of multiple filings: if the Turkish parent itself publishes a report that meets the Directive’s content and timing rules on its website, and the EU subsidiaries reference it, the subsidiaries are generally relieved of separate preparation. Member State rules differ on the exact mechanics, so the conditions must be checked country by country.

EU-parented groups with Turkish subsidiaries

An EU parent above the threshold publishes the report itself. Its Turkish subsidiary does not file anything in Turkey under the Directive, but the Turkish figures — revenue, headcount, profit, tax accrued and paid — become public on the parent’s report. For Turkish management teams, the practical question is whether the local numbers tell a coherent story when read in isolation.

How Turkey compares with other non-EU jurisdictions

Groups active in Turkey usually also operate in the UK, Switzerland, the UAE or North Africa. Their treatment in the public report is not the same:

JurisdictionEU list status (Oct 2026)Shown separately in public CbCR?
TurkeyAnnex II, listed for more than two consecutive yearsYes — and no deferral
United KingdomNot listedNo — may be aggregated
SwitzerlandNot listedNo — may be aggregated
United Arab EmiratesNot listedNo — may be aggregated
RussiaAnnex IYes
Morocco, JordanAnnex IIDepends on the two-consecutive-year test as of 1 March of the financial year — check listing history
PanamaMoved from Annex I to Annex II on 9 Oct 2026FY2026: yes (it was on Annex I on 1 March 2026)

The comparison matters for group communication: a Dubai or London entity can sit inside an aggregated figure, while the Istanbul entity next to it is published line by line.

Worked case analyses

The scenarios below are anonymised composites based on the types of files we review. Figures are rounded and illustrative.

Case 1 — Turkish industrial group with a German distribution company

Facts
Istanbul-headquartered manufacturer, consolidated revenue around EUR 1.1 billion for two years. A German GmbH (well above the small-company thresholds) and a Dutch BV handle EU sales.
The obvious answer
“The parent is Turkish, Turkey has no public CbCR law, so we have nothing to publish.”
Why it failed
The German GmbH is a medium-sized subsidiary of an in-scope group. It is the reporting entity, and its auditor must state whether the report was published. The report must cover the whole group, with Turkey separately because of Annex II.
Structure adopted
One report published by the Turkish parent on the group website in English, built on the OECD CbCR data already filed with the Turkish administration, referenced by both EU subsidiaries. Turkey, Germany and the Netherlands shown separately; other markets aggregated.

Case 2 — French group with a Turkish contract manufacturer

Facts
EU-parented group; the Turkish subsidiary manufactures on a cost-plus basis, employs over 1,000 people and holds an investment incentive certificate that lowers its corporate tax rate.
The obvious answer
“Publish the numbers as they come out of consolidation.”
Why it failed
Read on its own, the Turkey line showed high headcount, thin profit and a low effective rate — and tax paid well above tax accrued because of quarterly advance tax and the April corporate tax return timing. Without explanation, it looked like profit shifting out of Turkey and an unusual tax position.
Structure adopted
A short narrative for Turkey explaining the routine-return manufacturing profile under the transfer pricing policy, the incentive regime, and the accrued-versus-paid timing gap — reconciled to the Turkish corporate tax return and the Pillar Two safe-harbour data.

Case 3 — US group with a Turkish technology centre

Facts
US parent; an Irish subsidiary triggers EU reporting. The Turkish entity is a technopark-based R&D and software centre with substantial exemptions.
The obvious answer
“Turkey is small in group terms — it will be aggregated.”
Why it failed
Size is irrelevant; Annex II status is what matters. The Turkey line shows hundreds of engineers and close to zero corporate tax.
Structure adopted
Narrative referencing the statutory technology-zone regime, alignment of the intercompany R&D service charge with the published headcount, and a consistency check against the Turkish domestic minimum top-up tax return.

Practitioner view — Evren Özmen, CPA: In the files we see, the real risk is rarely the filing mechanics. It is that the Turkish line will be read by people who have never seen the group’s transfer pricing file. A Turkish subsidiary that is a low-risk distributor or a cost-plus service centre will show modest profit by design. That is defensible — but only if the narrative, the benchmarking and the Turkish tax returns say the same thing. We recommend that the Turkey line is reviewed by someone who knows both the Turkish returns and the group policy before anything is published.

What happens if…?

What happens if the group’s EU subsidiary does not publish the report?

Penalties are set by each Member State and vary in amount and procedure. Separately, the subsidiary’s statutory auditor must state in the audit report whether the public CbCR report was required and published, so non-compliance becomes visible in the audited financial statements.

What happens if Turkey is removed from the grey list in February 2027?

The test is applied as of 1 March of the financial year. If Turkey is no longer on Annex II on 1 March of a given year, separate disclosure would no longer be required for that year, and Turkish data could be aggregated. Removal in February 2027 would not change FY2025 or FY2026 reports.

What happens if our public CbCR figures differ from the CbC report filed in Turkey?

Differences are possible because the data definitions differ (for example, tax accrued excludes deferred tax). They are not a problem in themselves, but they should be reconciled and explainable. Unexplained gaps invite questions from the Turkish administration, EU auditors and readers of the report.

What happens if the Turkish parent publishes the report itself?

If the parent’s report meets the Directive’s content, format and timing requirements and is accessible free of charge on its website, the EU subsidiaries can generally rely on it rather than prepare their own. Each subsidiary still has to meet local business-register or website reference rules.

What happens if consolidated revenue drops below EUR 750 million?

The obligation stops only when revenue stays below the threshold for two consecutive financial years. One weaker year does not take the group out of scope.

What should companies do before 31 December 2026?

  1. Confirm scope. Test consolidated revenue for the last two years; map every EU subsidiary against the medium/large thresholds and every EU branch against the EUR 12 million test, by Member State.
  2. Decide who publishes. Parent-level publication or subsidiary-level filing; confirm the business-register and website requirements in each relevant Member State.
  3. Build the Turkey line separately. Aggregate all Turkish group entities (and Turkish branches) into one jurisdictional figure, using consistent definitions for revenue, current tax and cash tax.
  4. Reconcile. Compare the public figures with the Turkish CbC report, consolidated accounts, Turkish corporate tax returns and Pillar Two filings; document every material difference.
  5. Stress-test the transfer pricing story. Check that published Turkish revenue, headcount, profit and tax are consistent with the functional profile, royalty, service and financing arrangements in the group’s transfer pricing documentation.
  6. Prepare the format. Apply the common template and XHTML / Inline XBRL requirements under Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2952, plus any translation into an EU official language.
  7. Write the narrative. Explain the accrued-versus-paid gap and any incentive or exemption regime affecting the Turkish effective rate.

What drives the scope and effort of a public CbCR review?

We do not publish fees; engagements are scoped privately. The effort depends mainly on:

  • the number of Turkish group entities and branches that need to be combined into one Turkey figure;
  • how many EU Member States are involved, since transposition rules differ;
  • whether OECD CbCR data already exists in a reusable, reconciled form;
  • the complexity of Turkish incentives, exemptions and inflation-related adjustments affecting tax accrued;
  • whether a transfer pricing narrative and reconciliation to Pillar Two filings is required;
  • electronic format (iXBRL) and translation needs.

Our assessment

Turkey’s continued presence on the EU grey list turns public CbCR from an EU-only compliance task into a Turkey-specific disclosure. For in-scope groups, the Turkish financial and tax position will be published on its own line, cannot be deferred, and will be compared with every other country in the report. The question is no longer whether Turkish data will be visible, but whether it will be accurate, consistent and explainable — to tax authorities, auditors, investors, customers and the press.

Tax Certainty on your Turkey line before 31 December 2026

SYSTEMS CPA reviews the Turkish data in your public CbCR report: scope and filing-entity analysis, preparation of the Turkey jurisdiction figures, reconciliation with Turkish CbCR, corporate tax and Pillar Two filings, and a CPA-reviewed narrative for the Turkey line. We work with group tax teams, EU subsidiaries’ finance functions and their advisers.

Request a Public CbCR Turkey Review: info@ozmconsultancy.com

Primary sources

Evren Özmen, CPA
TÜRMOB Reg. No. 35675 · SYSTEMS CPA, Istanbul

Evren advises foreign-owned groups and Turkish-parented multinationals on corporate tax, transfer pricing, Pillar Two and cross-border reporting obligations involving Turkey.

LinkedIn · Wikidata · Full profile

Prefer SYSTEMS CPA in your Google results: add systemscpa.com as a preferred source.

This article is general information as of 22 October 2026 and is not tax advice for a specific group. Member State transposition rules differ; confirm the position for each relevant jurisdiction before filing.

Work with a licensed Turkish CPA firm

Turn Turkey compliance into certainty

SYSTEMS CPA supports foreign-owned companies with company formation, accounting, tax compliance and payroll in Turkey — one accountable local partner. Reviewed by Evren Özmen, SMMM (Certified Public Accountant), TÜRMOB Reg. No. 35675.

Schedule a Consultation →

Evren Özmen, CPA (SMMM)

Turkish Certified Public Accountant (SMMM), licensed by TÜRMOB — Reg. No. 35675. Advising international investors and companies on Turkish tax, accounting and compliance at OZM Consultancy, Istanbul.

WhatsAppCallConsultation